2001 BMW M vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (320 HP) has 110 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 542 kg more than 2001 BMW M.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M (345 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (344 Nm). This means 2001 BMW M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M | 2005 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | BMW | Mercury |
Model | M | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 4015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 345 Nm | 344 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1917 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.9 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.6 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 85 L |