2001 BMW M vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2005 Nissan Armada is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1132 kg more than 2001 BMW M.
Because 2005 Nissan Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW M. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW M. (345 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW M.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | M | Armada |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 2507 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.6 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 106 L |