2001 BMW M vs. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. (270 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 661 kg more than 2001 BMW M.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW M. (345 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW M.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M | 2005 Nissan Pathfinder | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | M | Pathfinder |
Year Released | 2001 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3949 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 345 Nm | 395 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 2036 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 80 L |