2001 BMW M vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (320 HP) has 172 more horse power than 2009 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden Epica.
Because 2001 BMW M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M (345 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 2001 BMW M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW M | 2009 Holden Epica | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | M | Epica |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
