2001 BMW M vs. 2009 Pontiac G3
To start off, 2009 Pontiac G3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M would be higher. At 3,169 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M (320 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 2009 Pontiac G3. (105 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M should accelerate faster than 2009 Pontiac G3.
Because 2001 BMW M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac G3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M (345 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Pontiac G3. (142 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2001 BMW M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Pontiac G3.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW M | 2009 Pontiac G3 | |
| Make | BMW | Pontiac |
| Model | M | G3 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 345 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2490 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.9 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 16.6 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.1 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 45 L |
