2001 BMW M3 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2001 BMW M3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 590 kg more than 2001 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW M3. (330 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M3 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | M3 | 62 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 6390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 582 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |