2001 BMW M3 vs. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer
To start off, 2001 BMW M3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer would be higher. At 4,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (119 HP @ 3450 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer weights approximately 350 kg more than 2001 BMW M3.
Because 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M3 (330 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. (316 Nm). This means 2001 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW M3 | 1962 Jeep Grand Wagoneer | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | M3 | Grand Wagoneer |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 4980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3450 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 316 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2800 mm |
