2001 BMW M3 vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2001 BMW M3 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW M3 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M3 | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | BMW | DKW |
Model | M3 | Munga |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 76.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 31 L |