2001 BMW M3 vs. 1993 Chrysler ES
To start off, 2001 BMW M3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (326 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 233 more horse power than 1993 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1993 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW M3 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1993 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M3 (355 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M3 | 1993 Chrysler ES | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | M3 | ES |
Year Released | 2001 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 87.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 8.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2470 mm |