2001 BMW M3 vs. 1995 Rover MGF
To start off, 2001 BMW M3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover MGF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover MGF would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1995 Rover MGF. (145 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover MGF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW M3 weights approximately 26 kg more than 1995 Rover MGF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M3 (330 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover MGF. (236 Nm). This means 2001 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover MGF.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M3 | 1995 Rover MGF | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | M3 | MGF |
Year Released | 2001 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 236 Nm |
Top Speed | 249 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1280 mm |