2001 BMW M3 vs. 1996 Proton 400

To start off, 2001 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 400 would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (342 HP) has 275 more horse power than 1996 Proton 400. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW M3 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1996 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M3 (502 Nm) has 379 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Proton 400. (123 Nm). This means 2001 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Proton 400. 2001 BMW M3 has automatic transmission and 1996 Proton 400 has manual transmission. 1996 Proton 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 BMW M3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: