2001 BMW M3 vs. 2003 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 203 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Condor. (114 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Condor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 82 kg more than 2001 BMW M3.
Because 2003 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M3 (330 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Toyota Condor. (195 Nm). This means 2001 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW M3 | 2003 Toyota Condor | |
| Make | BMW | Toyota |
| Model | M3 | Condor |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 2438 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1632 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2610 mm |
