2001 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (275 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 630 kg more than 2001 BMW M3.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW M3. (330 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M3 | 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | M3 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 4163 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3280 mm |