2001 BMW M3 vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2004 GMC Savana is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M3 would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (326 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2004 GMC Savana. (295 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 698 kg more than 2001 BMW M3.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (448 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW M3. (355 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M3 | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | M3 | Savana |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 5326 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 326 HP | 295 HP |
Torque | 355 Nm | 448 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 92 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 2353 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 17.9 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 117 L |