2001 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Kia Sedona

To start off, 2004 Kia Sedona is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 2004 Kia Sedona. (195 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Kia Sedona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Kia Sedona weights approximately 583 kg more than 2001 BMW M3.

Because 2001 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M3 (502 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Kia Sedona. (296 Nm). This means 2001 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Kia Sedona.

Compare all specifications:

2001 BMW M3 2004 Kia Sedona
Make BMW Kia
Model M3 Sedona
Year Released 2001 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3246 cc 3490 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 342 HP 195 HP
Engine RPM 7400 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 502 Nm 296 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Vehicle Weight 1595 kg 2178 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4940 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1900 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2920 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 75 L