2001 BMW M3 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2004 MCC Crossblade is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (317 HP) has 247 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW M3 weights approximately 810 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M3 (330 Nm) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2001 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW M3 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | BMW | MCC |
| Model | M3 | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2926 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1810 mm |
