2001 BMW M3 vs. 2007 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2007 Cadillac XLR is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M3 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Cadillac XLR (443 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 2001 BMW M3. (317 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Cadillac XLR (561 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW M3. (330 Nm). This means 2007 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW M3. 2007 Cadillac XLR has automatic transmission and 2001 BMW M3 has manual transmission. 2001 BMW M3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Cadillac XLR will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M3 | 2007 Cadillac XLR | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | M3 | XLR |
Year Released | 2001 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 4376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 443 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 561 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2690 mm |