2001 BMW M3 vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M3 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW M3 (342 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (288 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2010 Saturn Outlook. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Saturn Outlook weights approximately 145 kg more than 2001 BMW M3.
Because 2010 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW M3 (502 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Saturn Outlook. (366 Nm). This means 2001 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Saturn Outlook.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW M3 | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | BMW | Saturn |
Model | M3 | Outlook |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 342 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 502 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 83 L |