2001 BMW M3 vs. 2013 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW M3 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (380 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2001 BMW M3. (342 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XK weights approximately 115 kg more than 2001 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XK (515 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW M3. (502 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW M3. 2001 BMW M3 has automatic transmission and 2013 Jaguar XK has manual transmission. 2013 Jaguar XK will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 BMW M3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: