2001 BMW X5 vs. 1962 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2001 BMW X5 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Lincoln Continental (300 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2001 BMW X5. (189 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 158 kg more than 2001 BMW X5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Lincoln Continental (630 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW X5. (410 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1962 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW X5 | 1962 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | BMW | Lincoln |
Model | X5 | Continental |
Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 7043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 109.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 2328 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 90 L |