2001 BMW X5 vs. 1965 Cadillac Sixty
To start off, 2001 BMW X5 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Cadillac Sixty would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Sixty is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Sixty (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2001 BMW X5. (181 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Sixty should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW X5 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1965 Cadillac Sixty.
Because 2001 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Cadillac Sixty. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW X5 | 1965 Cadillac Sixty | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | X5 | Sixty |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 7029 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 181 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2155 kg | 2115 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 95 L |
