2001 BMW X5 vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2001 BMW X5 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,977 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO (197 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2001 BMW X5. (189 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW X5.
2001 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi FTO has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW X5 | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | BMW | Mitsubishi |
| Model | X5 | FTO |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1994 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2977 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.2 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.3 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
