2001 BMW X5 vs. 2008 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW X5 would be higher. At 3,201 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2001 BMW X5. (226 HP @ 7400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW X5.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover LR2 (317 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW X5. (290 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover LR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW X5 | 2008 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | BMW | Land Rover |
Model | X5 | LR2 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 317 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2180 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2670 mm |