2001 BMW X5 vs. 2010 Ford E-150
To start off, 2010 Ford E-150 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW X5 (226 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2010 Ford E-150. (171 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW X5 weights approximately 93 kg more than 2010 Ford E-150. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-150. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW X5 (290 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford E-150. (232 Nm). This means 2001 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW X5 | 2010 Ford E-150 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X5 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2926 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 226 HP | 171 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 290 Nm | 232 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1522 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2619 mm |