2001 BMW X5 vs. 2012 Ford E-150
To start off, 2012 Ford E-150 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2001 BMW X5. (189 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford E-150 weights approximately 441 kg more than 2001 BMW X5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford E-150. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW X5 (410 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford E-150. (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2001 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW X5 | 2012 Ford E-150 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X5 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 410 Nm | 387 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 4-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2170 kg | 2611 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 2085 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3505 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.3 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 132 L |