2001 BMW Z18 vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2001 BMW Z18 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z18 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z18 (323 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z18 weights approximately 1035 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 BMW Z18 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z18 (340 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z18 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z18 | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | BMW | DAF |
| Model | Z18 | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 323 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 53 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 665 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 33 L |
