2001 BMW Z18 vs. 1963 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2001 BMW Z18 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z18 (323 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. (198 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 320 kg more than 2001 BMW Z18.
Because 2001 BMW Z18 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Cadillac DeVille (582 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z18. (340 Nm). This means 1963 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z18.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z18 | 1963 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z18 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 323 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 2020 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 79 L |
