2001 BMW Z18 vs. 1992 Skoda Rapid R

To start off, 2001 BMW Z18 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z18 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z18 (323 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1992 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 should accelerate faster than 1992 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z18 weights approximately 848 kg more than 1992 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 BMW Z18 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Skoda Rapid R. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z18 (340 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z18 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Skoda Rapid R. 2001 BMW Z18 has automatic transmission and 1992 Skoda Rapid R has manual transmission. 1992 Skoda Rapid R will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 BMW Z18 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: