2001 BMW Z18 vs. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2001 BMW Z18 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z18 (323 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (225 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 should accelerate faster than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z18 weights approximately 52 kg more than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee (407 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z18. (340 Nm). This means 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z18.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z18 | 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | Z18 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 5200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 323 HP | 225 HP |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1648 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 87 L |
