2001 BMW Z18 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z18 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z18 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z18 (323 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 94 kg more than 2001 BMW Z18.
Because 2001 BMW Z18 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z18 (340 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (232 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z18 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z18 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z18 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4400 cc | 2597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 323 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1794 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |
