2001 BMW Z18 vs. 2006 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2006 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z18 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z18 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z18 (323 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 163 more horse power than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 should accelerate faster than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z18 weights approximately 23 kg more than 2006 Jeep Cherokee. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Jeep Cherokee (400 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z18. (340 Nm). This means 2006 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z18.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z18 | 2006 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | Z18 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 2774 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 323 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 400 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1677 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 78 L |