2001 BMW Z18 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z18. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z18 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z18 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z18 (323 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (286 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 should accelerate faster than 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 414 kg more than 2001 BMW Z18.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z18. (340 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z18.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z18 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | Z18 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4400 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 323 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 2114 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 93 L |