2001 BMW Z22 vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2001 BMW Z22 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 380 kg more than 1953 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 BMW Z22 has automatic transmission and 1953 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1953 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 BMW Z22 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 1953 Riley RM A | |
Make | BMW | Riley |
Model | Z22 | RM A |
Year Released | 2001 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1496 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1235 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2870 mm |