2001 BMW Z22 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2001 BMW Z22 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 481 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | Z22 | EJ |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2262 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 163 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1134 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |