2001 BMW Z22 vs. 1963 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 2001 BMW Z22 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Spitfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Spitfire would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Spitfire. (62 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Spitfire. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 910 kg more than 1963 Triumph Spitfire. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Spitfire. (91 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 1963 Triumph Spitfire | |
Make | BMW | Triumph |
Model | Z22 | Spitfire |
Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1147 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 91 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 705 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 40 L |