2001 BMW Z22 vs. 1969 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2001 BMW Z22 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (156 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 1969 Dodge Challenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 1969 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | Z22 | Challenger |
Year Released | 2001 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 5208 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 352 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1495 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |