2001 BMW Z22 vs. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2001 BMW Z22 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 7,462 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (248 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 185 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass (502 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 1972 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | BMW | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Z22 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 7462 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 248 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 502 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2850 mm |
