2001 BMW Z22 vs. 1993 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 2001 BMW Z22 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJS would be higher. At 5,996 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1993 Jaguar XJS. (309 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 1993 Jaguar XJS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Jaguar XJS weights approximately 185 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJS (476 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 1993 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 1993 Jaguar XJS | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | Z22 | XJS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 5996 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 309 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 476 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 86 L |
