2001 BMW Z22 vs. 1996 Renault Clio
To start off, 2001 BMW Z22 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Clio would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP) has 78 more horse power than 1996 Renault Clio. (250 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Clio weights approximately 35 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Clio (407 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 1996 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22. 2001 BMW Z22 has automatic transmission and 1996 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 1996 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 BMW Z22 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 1996 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | Z22 | Clio |
Year Released | 2001 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 350 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1650 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |