2001 BMW Z22 vs. 1998 Kia Retona
To start off, 2001 BMW Z22 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Kia Retona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Kia Retona would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1998 Kia Retona. (90 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 1998 Kia Retona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Kia Retona weights approximately 255 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Because 1998 Kia Retona is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Retona will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Kia Retona. (205 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Kia Retona. 2001 BMW Z22 has automatic transmission and 1998 Kia Retona has manual transmission. 1998 Kia Retona will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 BMW Z22 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 1998 Kia Retona | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | Z22 | Retona |
Year Released | 2001 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1998 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 205 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1870 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2370 mm |