2001 BMW Z22 vs. 1999 Acura TL
To start off, 2001 BMW Z22 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1999 Acura TL. (226 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 1999 Acura TL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1999 Acura TL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 BMW Z22 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW Z22. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Acura TL. (294 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 1999 Acura TL | |
Make | BMW | Acura |
Model | Z22 | TL |
Year Released | 2001 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3210 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 294 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |