2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2000 Kia Sephia II
To start off, 2001 BMW Z22 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Kia Sephia II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Kia Sephia II would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 2000 Kia Sephia II. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Sephia II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 553 kg more than 2000 Kia Sephia II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 BMW Z22 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW Z22. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Kia Sephia II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Kia Sephia II. (145 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Kia Sephia II.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 2000 Kia Sephia II | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | Z22 | Sephia II |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 1594 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1062 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 65 L |