2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2001 BMW Z22 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2000 Opel Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2000 Opel Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 118 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Opel Omega. (210 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Opel Omega. 2001 BMW Z22 has automatic transmission and 2000 Opel Omega has manual transmission. 2000 Opel Omega will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 BMW Z22 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | BMW | Opel |
Model | Z22 | Omega |
Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2198 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 142 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 210 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1733 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |