2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2003 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (163 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 121 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (230 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | Z22 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2485 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1494 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 60 L |