2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2004 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2004 Mazda B2500 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 4,031 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B2500. (204 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 90 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Because 2004 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B2500. (323 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B2500. 2001 BMW Z22 has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda B2500 has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda B2500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 BMW Z22 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 2004 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | Z22 | B2500 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 4031 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 323 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1705 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2990 mm |