2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2006 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 179 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac CTS. (232 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | Z22 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2597 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 179 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1794 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |
