2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2006 Kia Sedona
To start off, 2006 Kia Sedona is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Kia Sedona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2006 Kia Sedona. (195 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2006 Kia Sedona.
Because 2001 BMW Z22 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW Z22. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Kia Sedona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Kia Sedona. (296 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Kia Sedona.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 2006 Kia Sedona | |
| Make | BMW | Kia |
| Model | Z22 | Sedona |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 3497 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |
