2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2008 Land Rover Range Rover. (176 HP @ 2000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2008 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 885 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z22. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (390 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z22. (350 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z22.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | BMW | Land Rover |
| Model | Z22 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2926 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 390 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 2500 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 100 L |
