2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2009 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac BLS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2009 Cadillac BLS. (247 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2009 Cadillac BLS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z22 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2009 Cadillac BLS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 BMW Z22 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW Z22. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 350 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2001 BMW Z22 | 2009 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | Z22 | BLS |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2792 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 350 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1560 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 58 L |