2001 BMW Z22 vs. 2009 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z22. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z22 would be higher. At 3,169 cc, 2001 BMW Z22 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z22 (328 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Voyager. (145 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z22 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 305 kg more than 2001 BMW Z22.
Because 2001 BMW Z22 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 BMW Z22. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z22 (350 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Voyager. (218 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z22 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 BMW Z22 | 2009 Chrysler Voyager | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | Z22 | Voyager |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3169 cc | 2429 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 350 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1615 kg | 1920 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |
